HN2 Elastomer in Swift Current

CASe summary

The optimal performance of a pump depends on having the right elastomer. Lifting Solutions’ client, Whitecap Resources (WCR), was looking for a more efficient way to extract medium-grade oil from their wells that also had a high water-cut ratio (water produced vs oil produced) using a Progressing Cavity (PC) Pump application.

WCR was using one of our High Nitrile Elastomers, HN1, at the time but it wasn’t getting the results needed. This opportunity allowed Lifting Solutions’ engineering and technical team to investigate a new opportunity—the development of a new elastomer that increases pump efficiency by withstanding the oil conditions for even longer periods.

Our High Nitrile, HN2, elastomer was developed and brought to WCR as a solution to their challenge. The well successfully ran with higher efficiency, decreasing well interventions, increasing operational time, and decreasing operational expenses.

BACKGROUND – THE WELL ENVIRONMENT

The well environment in Swift Current, Saskatchewan causes elastomer swelling and hardness changes. If incorrectly estimated, the elastomer swell will reduce pump performance and longevity. The baseline efficiency of the pump is an important factor in the pump selection process, as well as to predict swell needs. There are four possible scenarios to produce a different type of performance as outlined below in Table 1.

ROTOR SIZING	SWELL ESTIMATION	PERFORMANCE STATE	PERFORMANCE EFFECT
Undersized	Underestimated (low overall)	Low pumping efficiency	Under compression, slippage, wear, and fluid washing
Undersized	Overestimated (high overall)	Adequate pumping efficiency	Adverse elastomer effects of high swell
Oversized	Underestimated (low overall)	Adequate pumping efficiency	Ok
Oversized	Overestimated (high overall)	High operating torque	Over compression, increased friction, and wear

The process of initial swelling can take anywhere from several weeks to one month, depending on a variety of factors. During this time, the pumping system can operate in an inefficient state as swell begins to increase toward adequate compression fit. This leads to slippage, wear, and fluid washing.

In contrast, the swelling process can result in an excessive compression fit and cause high pump torque, significant wear, the hysteresis of the elastomer, and missing rubber.

In the Swift Current region, produced fluids contain elements that cause significant swelling of the elastomer. These elements can be high-water cuts, medium-grade API oils, and potential free gas. Originally the high nitrile (HN1) elastomer was the best fit for this area as it has mechanical and dynamic properties capable of handling the wellbore environment. Traditional PC Pump applications take place in low API heavy oil fields and use medium nitrile elastomers due to the absence of fluid swell and the requirement for abrasive resistance. High nitrile elastomer is better designed for medium-grade, high aromatic content oil applications. The typical application approach was to target a low baseline efficiency in anticipation of significant fluid swell.

CLIENT CHALLENGE

Prior installs with the HN1 elastomer led to positive run times for WCR. However, there was poor initial performance and inconsistency because of the variability of high swell rates. A low-swelling HN2 elastomer has better optimization potential. Increasing initial production rates and preventing pump failures reduces OPEX costs and increase run time/production rates. WCR’s goal was to increase production, have longer run times, and prevent costly workovers. With significant historical operational data in the area, Lifting Solutions’ analysis had already begun on an elastomer formulation opportunity that would improve pump efficiency from day one, and remove ambiguity from pump sizing with a swell-resistant pump system offering.

THE LS SOLUTION

Lifting Solutions’ engineering team underwent the development of the HN2 elastomer to better suit applications with similar conditions and problems. Numerous materials testing methods were conducted, such as fluid compatibility testing, to strategically analyze the changes in variations of high nitrile elastomers. The final product, a result of 160+ analyzed and tested formulations, is the Lifting Solutions’ HN2 elastomer. HN2 demonstrates superior mechanical properties as shown in Table 2.

ELASTOMER CLASSIFICATION AND PROPERTIES

PROPERTY	STANDARD	UNITS	SOFT NITRILE (SN1) LS ELASTOMER	MEDIUM NITRILE (MN1) LS ELASTOMER	HIGH NITRILE (HN1) LS ELASTOMER	HIGH NITRILE (HN2) LS ELASTOMER
ACN Content	ASTM D5508-16	%	30-35	30-35	40-45	30-35
Specific Gravity	ASTM D792	Unitless	1.18	1.23	1.23	1.21
Hardness	ISO 7619-1	Shore A pts	58	68	73	73
Ultimate Tensile Strength	ASTM D412	PSI	2089	2384	2444	3047
Ultimate Elongation at Break	ASTM D412	%	854	594	445	570
Tear Strength	ASTM D 624 -T	lbs./in	141	126	80	73
Unaged Stator Bonding – Rubber Retention	ISO 15136-1 A.4.5.1	None	R100	R100	R100	R100
Maximum Operating Temperature	–	°C	60	80	80	100
Maximum API Gravity	–	degrees	15	20 (25*)	30 (35*)	35 (40*)

In comparison to HN1, HN2 has a much lower swell in higher API gravity oils and associated levels of aromatics. Swell, due to water, is slightly higher with HN2 due to the polymer change for better oil resistance. Increased water swell can be viewed as trivial due to an oil and water composition, which is virtually one-half with HN2 vs HN1. (Refer to Table 3 and Table 4 for additional details.)

The bond strength of the HN2 elastomer was another key focus in development resulting in significant improvements, notably, in terms of bond retention in high-temperature fluids to simulate extended downhole exposure to higher temperatures.

FLUID	TEMPERATURE	API GRAVITY	HN1	HN2
WATER	100oC	n/a	4.8	6.5
WATER	80oC	n/a	3.4	5.5
WATER	60oC	n/a	3.2	4.1
IRM 903	100oC	23	6.2	-0.7
IRM 903	60oC	23	3.3	-1.2
DIESEL	60oC	38	16.1	6.5
FUEL B	30oC	55	25.4	14

FLUID	TEMPERATURE	API GRAVITY	WATER CUT (%)	HN1	HN2
C1F1	50oC	19	30	6.6	3.6
C1F2	50oC	21	80	4.9	2.7
C1F3	50oC	22	85	3.9	2.4
C1F4	50oC	21	97	3.5	2.2
C2F5	60oC	38	0	6.7	2.7
C3F6	50oC	26	70	5.5	3.0

Lifting Solutions continues to monitor field results with initial installation and our findings continue to show a significant runtime improvement as shown in Figure 2.

CONCLUSION

Lifting Solutions’ development of the HN2 elastomer continues to succeed in the field. Our team understands the importance of having the right elastomer to optimize the performance of a Progressing Cavity Pump application. Contributing factors include:

• Higher initial production efficiency in the early stages of elastomer swell
• Less margin of error on initial sizing due to the lower overall swell rates
• Longer run times associated with improved elastomer mechanical properties and swelled rotor/stator fit
• The optimal sizing state gained with the improved elastomer is effective at preventing premature failures due to excess slippage, fluid washing and accelerated wear